My Shopping Cart
Prices are EX WORKS. Delivery calculated separately based on freight and local handling.
The BenchMARK Semi-Automatic Label Applicator is the definitive solution for artisan olive oil, vinegar, and small-batch jar producers seeking professional results without industrial infrastructure. Assembled in Australia, this bench-top unit delivers millimetre-perfect label placement through a smooth, manual motion that requires minimal operator training.
Equipped with an intelligent optical edge-detection sensor, the BenchMARK ensures precise alignment for single, front-and-back, or full wrap-around labels without the need for printed registration marks. It is compatible with a vast array of pressure-sensitive labels—including opaque, clear, and translucent formats—and accommodates round containers from 50mm to 110mm in diameter (standard setup).
Built to last, the machine is constructed from anodized 6061 aluminium and food-grade stainless steel, ensuring both durability and easy sanitation for food production environments.
Scalable Growth: The BenchMARK is designed to grow with your business. Its modular frame allows for future upgrades to the BenchDELUXE (motorised/foot pedal) or BenchMAX (orientation sensors) without replacing the base machine.
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Machine Type | Semi-automatic bench-top (manual insertion) |
| Typical Throughput | Up to 1,040 – 1,200 containers per hour |
| Container Diameter | 50mm to 110mm (Standard) | From 8mm (with Small Container Adapter) |
| Label Dimensions | Height: 10mm–230mm | Length: ≥25mm | Thickness: ≥0.02mm |
| Roll Capacity | Max OD: 300mm | Core: 38mm–76mm |
| Dimensions (L×W×H) | 61cm × 59cm × 44cm |
| Net Weight | 33 kg |
| Warranty | 5 Year nationwide parts and frame warranty |
Important! Please check the ANZFA website at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/ to view the new joint Australian New Zealand Food Standards Code.
For additional information contact ANZFA via email advice@anzfa.com.au or phone the 'advice desk' on 1300 652 166 (for the cost of a local call).
Suggestions for information on olive oil labels:
On 1 July 2016, the Australian Government introduced changes to country of origin labelling for food to provide clearer and more meaningful information to the Australian community about where their food comes from.
Implemented through the Country of Origin Food Labelling Information Standard, most Australian foods will need to carry a label with a clearly defined box containing:
A Bill is also currently being considered by the Parliament which, if passed, will:
To assist businesses in applying the new requirements, the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, in partnership with the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, is proposing to hold a series of forums in capital cities and regional centres around Australia in February or March 2017.
Interested businesses are encouraged to go to consult.industry.gov.au/cool-taskforce/cool-forums to express their interest and nominate a preferred location.
Information on the reforms, along with several tools to assist with creating labels, is available at business.gov.au/foodlabels
If you spend extra money on so-called "extra virgin" olive oil, there's a good chance you didn't get what you paid for. Our firm is investigating a recent UC Davis study which found that more than two-thirds of common brands of extra virgin olive oil failed to meet internationally accepted standards. Popular varieties marketed by Bertolli, Pompeian, Carapelli, Mezzetta, and Mazola are just some of the brands that failed the UC Davis tests.
As a result of the mislabeling found in this study, thousands of U.S. consumers may have paid a premium price for a substandard olive oil. Even worse, these phony extra virgin olive oils could pose a serious health risk to people with allergies, as the study found that many were blended with cheaper canola, seed or nut oils.
We are currently investigating a possible class action lawsuit against the companies responsible for this deception. If you believe you purchased olive oil that was incorrectly labeled as “extra virgin” or would like to learn more about our investigation, please contact us today for a free consultation.
Extra Virgin Olive OilExtra virgin is the highest grade of olive oil, according to standards set by the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the International Olive Council, an international, intergovernmental organization that deals with issues involving olives and olive oil. The council, established by the United Nations, includes countries that produce 98 percent of the world’s table olives and olive oil.
The United States is not a member of the council; however olive oil produced in the U.S. must meet recently adopted USDA olive oil standards, which closely correspond to the international standards and will go into effect on Oct. 25, 2010. The standards include specifications for the grades of extra virgin, virgin, refined olive oil and olive oil.
Extra virgin olive oil can be adulterated by mixing extra virgin with cheaper refined oils such as hazelnut oil or with a cheaper refined olive oil, making the adulteration more difficult to chemically detect.
For some time now, many have suspected that much of the extra virgin olive oil marketed in the U.S. was anything but that. The UC Davis study, the first of its kind by an American academic institution, provides the first empirical proof of this deception.
UC Davis Extra Virgin Olive Oil StudyFor their landmark study, researches at UC Davis purchased 14 imported brands and five California-produced brands of olive oil that were being sold as extra virgin at retail stores in California. Three bottles of each imported brand and two bottles of each California brand were sent to the Australian Oils Research Laboratory in New South Wales, where the oils were put through sensory and chemical tests specified by the international Olive Council and also were analyzed using methods adopted in Germany and Australia. Chemical analyses also were conducted at the UC Davis Olive Oil Chemistry Laboratory, in most cases using bottles with the same lot numbers as those tested in Australia.
The research team found that 69 percent of the imported oils sampled and 10 percent of the California-produced oils sampled failed to meet internationally accepted standards for extra virgin olive oil.
Of the following brands, every sample failed to meet the extra virgin olive oil standards:
Other samples of extra virgin olive oil brands such as Filippo Berio, Colavita, Newman's Own Organics, Safeway Select, and 365 Everyday Value, were also found to not meet the international extra virgin olive standards.
According to the study, the defective samples failed the extra virgin standards for one or more of these reasons:
The study also revealed that the analytical chemistry methods established by the International Olive Council and the USDA often do not detect defective oils that fail extra virgin sensory standards. On the other hand, the chemistry methods used in Australia and Germany were more effective in confirming negative sensory tests, the study found.
Extra Virgin Olive Oil Labeling Class Action LawsuitCountless U.S. consumers may have paid far too much for an inferior olive oil that was mislabeled extra virgin. If you were among them, you may be entitled to compensation. To find out more about a possible class action lawsuit, please fill out our online form, or call 1 800 LAW INFO (1-800-529-4636) today.
(Source: Parker Waichman Alonso LLP Link: Extra Virgin Olive Oil)
RELIABLE LABELLING MACHINES FOR ACCURATE, HIGH-EFFICIENCY PACKAGING
Reliable labelling systems are essential for consistent product identification, accurate label placement, and packaging efficiency. Selecting the correct machine requires matching the equipment to the specific characteristics of each container. Bottles, vials, and jars vary in wall shape, surface regularity, height, and diameter, making equipment compatibility a critical engineering decision. To achieve reliable performance, all packaging variations should be assessed by a specialist experienced in labelling and packaging equipment.
The labelling process consists of several controlled mechanical and adhesive-transfer stages. Each stage must operate precisely to ensure consistent results
Label Feed- The label is drawn from the roll and routed through the machine using rollers or tension-controlled guides.
Label Pickup- Pickup may be achieved via:
Compression and Securing- Once positioned, the label is secured using:
Semi-automatic systems require manual placement of each container before the labelling cycle is triggered using:
Suitable for small to mid-scale operations requiring flexibility and short changeover times. Models:
The Benchmax supports the widest range of product sizes and offers high application speeds suitable for industrial output. It applies transparent or clear labels with high precision.
Fully automatic systems integrate into production lines following filling and capping. Conveyors transfer containers across each station.
Automated lines may include:
The Polaris Line demonstrates a complete automated workflow from filling through to finished bottles.
Labeling machines generally come in two formats: semi-automatic and fully automatic. Semi-automatic labeling machines require manual placement of each bottle or container before the labeling cycle begins, and the operation is typically triggered by a turn handle, button, or foot pedal.
Fully automatic labeling machines are integrated directly into the production line, usually following the filling and capping stages. These systems rely on conveyors to move packaging through each section of the process. Containers may be fed in automatically by a depalletizer and packed at the exit point by machine, though these steps can also be performed manually depending on the overall line configuration and equipment capabilities.
Manufactured in Australia, the Benchmate delivers excellent performance in the entry-level category. This manually operated label applicator is driven by a simple turn handle.
The Benchmark, also manufactured in Australia, is the next level up from the Benchmate and can apply single, full wrap-around, or front-and-back labels with ease.
The Benchmax handles the widest range of product sizes and delivers exceptional speed, making it ideal for high-output industrial applications. It’s user-friendly and supports precise application of transparent or clear labels.
Observe the foot-pedal system in use.
Watch the full Polaris Line showcase, demonstrating filling, capping, and labeling from start to finish.
View the entire workflow of filling, capping, and labeling.
Over the years, I’ve encountered a wide range of labelling problems and have helped many producers fine-tune their equipment, as correct setup and label tension are absolutely critical. Some of the most common labelling issues arise because:
Correct setup of the labelling machine is essential. Below, you can see the BenchMax being adjusted for operation:
Correct configuration of equipment, such as the BenchMARK and BenchMAX systems, requires:
These steps ensure repeatability and reliable performance.
A label is a critical component of product presentation and an extension of brand identity. Reliable equipment ensures consistent quality, operational efficiency, and long-term cost stability.
See more about:
Australian-made, Great Engineering labellers offer a suite of features that position them among the best in the industry. These pressure-sensitive labelling machines represent a new generation of “on-demand” equipment designed for cylindrical containers. They’re ideal for sectors such as food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, wine, essential oils, edible oils, brewing, contract packaging, health foods, and preserves — providing consistent product identification and strong shelf presence for any round container. With a global reputation for reliability and performance, their machines are now exported to 55 countries and are recognised for their innovative engineering and high manufacturing quality.
BRANDS: https://theolivecentre.com/brand/great-engineering-labelling-machines-benchmark-benchmate-olive-oil
Polaris Automazioni has been active in the bottling sector since the 1960s, operating from its facility in Reggio nell’Emilia, Italy. Over time, the company has become highly specialised in developing and manufacturing automatic filling systems for unique and specialty bottles, a product line that has achieved strong success in markets worldwide.
The company now offers an extensive range of machines featuring advanced technology, high production efficiency, and patented engineering, enabling them to meet a wide variety of industry needs. Today, the Polaris team continues to uphold the technical heritage established by its founder, driving further growth through a blend of expertise, innovation, and forward-looking design.
On 1 July 2016, the Australian Government introduced changes to country of origin labelling for food to provide clearer and more meaningful information to the Australian community about where their food comes from.
Implemented through the Country of Origin Food Labelling Information Standard, most Australian foods will need to carry a label with a clearly defined box containing:
?
A Bill is also currently being considered by the Parliament which, if passed, will:
Interested businesses are encouraged to go to?consult.industry.gov.au/cool-taskforce/cool-forums?to express their interest and nominate a preferred location.
Information on the reforms, along with several tools to assist with creating labels, is available at?business.gov.au/foodlabels?
Considerations when 'planning your label'
Australia and New Zealand Food Authority
Some requirements for labelling:
For additional information contact FSANZ via email advice@anzfa.com.au or phone the 'advice desk' on 1300 652 166 (for the cost of a local call).
Suggestions for information on olive oil labels:
Read more about Labelling
CoOL information forums for food
The Department of Industry Innovation and Science, in partnership with the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, will be conducting information forums to educate businesses on the CoOL (Country of Origin Labelling) reforms for food. The forums will be held in capital cities and major regional centres during March 2017.
The forums will primarily target small and medium businesses that work in food production, wholesaling, retailing, importing and related industries such as printing and packaging. They are designed to help businesses understand the new labels, including the requirements that need to be met to make ?grown in?/?product of?/?made in? claims and how to determine the proportion of Australian ingredients. The forums will also include a demonstration of the online tool which can be used to help identify appropriate labels for food products.
The forums will be held in the following locations:
Capital Cities
Regional Centres
Each forum will take approximately two hours followed by time for informal discussions. For further details and to register, please visit www.business.gov.au/FoodLabellingForums.
We encourage you to attend and to pass this information on to others who may be interested.
Competition and Consumer Amendment (Country of Origin) Act 2017
The Competition and Consumer Amendment (Country of Origin) Act 2017 has been passed by Parliament and come into effect. The Act simplifies the tests to justify a country of origin ?made in? claim by clarifying what substantial transformation means and removing the onerous 50 percent production cost test. This means that businesses producing goods such as medicines, food, textiles, clothing and footwear will find the criteria for using a ?made in? claim clearer and simpler. Food businesses will only need to consider the proportion of local and imported ingredients by ingoing weight, not value, when making origin statements. Other businesses will no longer have to recalculate the relative shares of imported and local content to support their origin claim.
The Act also creates a new safe harbour defence for products labelled in accordance with Information Standards, such as the Country of Origin Food Labelling Information Standard 2016. Complying with these defences will assure businesses that their country of origin claims are not false or misleading under the Australian Consumer Law.
For more information on the country of origin labelling for food, please visit:www.business.gov.au/foodlabels . For specific queries about the requirements, you can contact us on 13 28 46 or via the online enquiry from at www.business.gov.au/Forms/Email-us .
_________________________________
Here are the latest developments regarding the country of origin labelling reforms.
As we noted in our last email of June 20, it has been necessary to make some amendments to section 22 of the Information Standard. This section provides labelling options for:
As originally drafted, this section did not fully reflect the policy adopted by Australian governments for products made in a single overseas country with ingredients from one or more other countries.
The necessary amendments have been made and are now in effect, with an amending Information Standard placed on the Federal Register of Legislation (PDF version/Word version) on 5 December 2016. For an explanation of the changes and what they might mean for you, please visit www.industry.gov.au/cool.
A replacement Explanatory Statement (PDF version/word version) have also been provided for the Information Standard. The updated Explanatory Statement covers the amendments to section 22 and provides additional clarity around the application of the Information Standard to online sales. It also clarifies what the definition of ?country? is for the purposes of the Information Standard. We encourage you to review the Explanatory Statement to better understand the labelling requirements.
Updated resources available
The country of origin labelling online tool has been updated to reflect the amendments to the Information Standard, and labels for products that meet the criteria of section 22 are now available. The ACCC will shortly update its online guidance materials to cover the section 22 changes and also to provide some further clarity to businesses on other issues. Businesses wishing to stay up-to-date on the latest news from the ACCC, including on country of origin labelling, can subscribe to the ACCC?s Small Business Information Network at www.accc.gov.au/sbin.
The business.gov.au site for the country of origin labelling is being updated, to include information specific to importers. The Style guide is also being revised to clarify some areas we have been regularly asked about.
Business forums in 2017
The department will be conducting forums on the changes to country of origin labelling for businesses in early 2017. To assist us in planning these forums, we are seeking input on where these forums should be held. We would encourage you to participate in the survey and have your views heard.
Replacement of the Commerce (Imports) Regulations 1940
The Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Regulation 2016 (CTD Regulation) is due to commence on 1 April 2017. The CTD Regulation will replace the sunsetting Commerce (Imports) Regulations 1940.
The CTD Regulation aligns with the country of origin labelling requirements for food. The mandatory changes to food labelling will not take effect until the end of the transition period for the Information Standard (1 July 2018). More information regarding the CTD Regulation will be made available on the Department of Immigration and Border Protection website prior to commencement.
Roundtable on origin labelling for seafood
On Monday 28 November, the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science, the Hon Greg Hunt MP, advised the House of Representatives that the Government would consider ways in which origin labelling for seafood sold in food service outlets could be improved. Assistant Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science, the Hon Craig Laundy MP, will be chairing a roundtable in the first half of 2017 to seek feedback on this issue from stakeholders. Attendees are expected to include representatives from state and territory governments and relevant industry sectors. The outcomes of this process will be reported to Parliament within 12 months.
Safe harbour defences Bill
The Competition and Consumer Amendment (Country of Origin) Bill 2016 to amend the safe harbour defences under the Australian Consumer Law passed the House of Representatives on 29 November 2016 and was introduced to the Senate the same day. The Senate Economics Committee has already held an inquiry on the Bill, releasing a report on 10 October 2016, recommending its passage.
Details of the Bill and supporting documents can be found on the Australian Parliamentary website.
As you may know, the amendment is primarily intended to simplify the tests used to justify a country of origin ?made in? claim by clarifying what substantial transformation means and removing the ?50% production cost test?. The Bill also creates a new safe harbour defence for products labelled in accordance with Information Standards. The proposed changes aim to better reflect consumer expectations and international practice and align with the new Information Standard.
This video shows a 100mL bottle called a 'BellOlio' being labelled. ?It has a square base and a round top. ?You will see we can label at the rate of 18 bottles per minute with this difficult bottle. The BenchMAX is revolutionary in design as it can detect the edge of a square base and uses it as a reference point to accurately apply a front label then the back label. ?(Please note: ?If the front and back labels are on the same web/backing material then this application of both labels would be quicker).
https://youtu.be/Ad_k7Xg7Vz4
Orchard Spray Equipment: ?Set Up and Calibration by Dr Greg O'Sullivan
Efficient pest and disease management require the setting up and calibration of spray equipment so that application of pesticides is controlled and accurate.
With correctly set up and calibrated equipment an operator can accurately control the quantity of chemical and volume of water applied per hectare. ?This ensures that the legal obligations associated with label rate compliance are met and that spray efficacy is maximised.
Poorly set up and uncalibrated spray equipment can result in an excessive application of pesticides resulting in increased expense, plant injury, environmental contamination and undue operator exposure. ?Low application rates may result in ineffective control and sub-lethal doses that will add to resistance development in pest organisms.
Once the equipment is set up, spray calibration is a fairly simple operation and each sprayer should be calibrated at the beginning of the season and re-checked regularly throughout the season. ?The three main factors used to calibrate equipment are; travel speed, spray volume (litres/hectare) and nozzle output. ?The travel speed and spray volume are established first, then, if necessary, modifications are made to the nozzle size and operating pressure to achieve the required output.
Travel Speed
Each type of spray equipment has a recommended speed range in which it should be operated and these can be obtained from the manufacturer. ?Some general recommendations are presented in table 1.
Table 1. General travel speeds for various spray equipment
| Equipment Type | General Speed |
| Hand-Held Equipment (Herbicides) | Comfortable walking speed 3-4 km/hr |
| Boom Type Sprayers (Herbicides) | 8km / hr |
| Air Blast Sprayers | 4-7km/hr |
| Air Shear Sprayers | 4-7km/hr |
Once the travel speed has been determined and the equipment calibrated, the operating speed must remain constant in all subsequent spray applications. ?Travelling at greater speeds will apply less pesticide per hectare and, vice versa, travelling slower will increase the rate of pesticide applied. ?If the travelling speed is to be changed the equipment must be re-calibrated.
Nozzle set up
Correct nozzle selection is vital in optimising pesticide application to obtain effective coverage, maximum control and reduced chemical wastage. ?Nozzles are designed to produce specific-sized droplets, spray patterns and outputs depending on the pump operating pressure. ?In general, there are three main types of nozzles used in pesticide application - Solid Cone, Hollow Cone and Fan nozzles (as outlined in Table 2).
Different targets catch some droplet sizes better than others and nozzles are designed to provide the optimal droplet size ranges for each target. ?Table 3 provides guidelines on the optimal droplet size ranges for different targets.
Table 2. Nozzles type and Uses.
| Nozzle Types | Common Use | Operating Pressure | Droplet Characteristics |
| Solid Cone | High volume application insecticides and fungicides |
High Pressure
4-25 Bar (60-360 psi) |
Small droplets. Good foliage penetration. |
| Hollow Cone | Low volume application application of insecticides and fungicides. Special herbicide applications requiring good foliage cover. |
Moderate Pressure 4-8 Bar
(60-110 psi) |
Small droplets. Good foliage penetration |
| Fan (tapered or even) | Herbicides |
Low Pressure
1-3 Bar (15-40 psi) |
Large droplets. Reduced drift. |
Table 3. Droplet size ranges for different targets
| Target | Droplet sizes |
| Flying insects | 10-50 microns |
| Insects on foliage | 30-50 microns |
| Foliage diseases | 40-100 microns |
| Herbicide application | 250-500 microns |
Spray Volume
Spray applications are classified according to the volume of liquid applied. ?Table 4 provides the classifications for a mature orchard situation.
Table 4. Classification of pesticide sprays according to volume used per unit area
| Classification | Volume Applied (litres/hectare) |
| High volume (Dilute) | 1000+ |
| Low volume (Concentrated) | 200-500 |
High volume spraying
High volume sprays are designed to wet the plant surface to the point of run off and generally deliver more than 1000 litres of liquid per hectare. ?Most spray equipment can be used in high volume spraying as long as sufficient volume is used to obtain thorough wetness. ?The main disadvantages of high volume spraying is the wastage of up to 50% of the pesticide through run-off to the ground, and downtime involved in more frequent refills.
Low volume spraying
This refers to the application of a volume of water less than that required for high volume spraying.
Less water is applied to the trees but, at the same time, the same amount of chemical is used as would be under the high volume system. ?For this to be achieved the concentration of product in the spray mixture must be increased as the volume of the water is decreased.
Equipment setup for low volume spraying generates spray clouds of droplets of optimal size for the target (by reducing the proportions of larger and finer droplets), resulting in a more even and efficient coverage than that obtained with high volume sprayers.
The other advantages of low volume spraying are that there is no wastage through run-off, and downtime associated with refilling is reduced significantly (50 to 80%). ?Low-volume sprays of fungicides and insecticides can only be applied to tree canopies through specially designed air blast sprayers, or air shear mist blowers which generate droplets of controlled size and use air turbulence to direct the spray to the target. ?Low-volume sprays of herbicides, however, can be applied using traditional boom sprays mounted on vehicles such as ATV?s or tractors.
For low volume spraying the user selects the rate on the pesticide label as the amount of product per hectare. ?Therefore the amount of product used in spray mixture will depend on the output of the equipment - not the capacity of the tank.
In the past, many labels have not provided a low volume rate and most labels advise users to mix the product in grams or ml per 100 litres.
Changes are now being made to pesticide labels to help growers choose between low volume and high volume spraying. ?Labels of most existing products are being updated to include information for low volume spraying.
If for some reason it is not suitable to use a product through low volume equipment, the label will make that clear. ?This is the case with some miticides where a high volume spray to the point of run-off has been found to be more effective than a low volume spray.
Several terms have previously been used to describe the application of sprays, such as high volume, low volume, dilute spraying and concentrated spraying. ?To avoid confusion, the first step in the label revision has been to standardise the terminology so that only two terms are used on the label - dilute spraying (previously high volume) and concentrate spraying (previously low volume).
Steps in Calibration
??x speed (km/hr) x 0.1)
??x time to spray 1 ha (minutes)
Note: if the sprayer output per hectare differs significantly from the limits recommended on the label, the amount sprayed can be increased or decreased by changing the operating pressure of by using nozzles with larger or smaller orifices. ?Adjusting the operating pressure, however, is limited because nozzles must be operated within the pressure limits recommended by the manufacturer.
= label rate (L/ha) x tank volume (L)
sprayer output (L/ha)
Product dilution rate (ml/L)
= product rate (L/tank) x 1000
tank volume (L)
Note: when using dilute (high volume) sprays the calibration process stops at step 5. The product dilution rate does not have to be calculated as it is a fixed rate provided on the label as ml or grams per 100 litres regardless of the quantity of spray used per hectare. ?Generally, dilute rates have been based on a spray output of about 1000 litres per hectare.
Some examples:
Example 1
A grower using a low volume air blast sprayer intends to spray 10 hectares of olives with an insecticide.
??x speed (km/hr) x 0.1)
= 60 (8x 5 x 0.1)
= 60 4
= 15 minutes
?x time to spray 1 ha (min)
= 18 x 15
= 270 L / Ha
= label rate (L/ha) x tank volume (L)
sprayer output (L/ha)
= 2 x 2000 270
= 14.81 litres of insecticide per full tank
Product dilution rate (ml/L)
= product rate (L/tank) x 1000
tank volume (L)
= 14.81 x 1000 2000
= 7.41 ml of insecticide per litre of water
Example 2
= 2.1 litres/minute
??x speed (km/hr) x 0.1)
= 60 (1.2 x 8 x 0.1)
= 60 .96
62.5 minutes
??x time to spray 1 ha (min)
= 2.1 x 62.5
= 131.3 litres / Ha
= label rate (L/ha) x tank volume (L)
sprayer output (L/ha)
= 6 x 100 131.3
= 4.6 ?Litres of Roundup per full tank
Product dilution rate (ml/L)
= product rate (L/ tank) x 1000
tank volume (L)
= 4.6 x 1000 100
?= 46 ml of Roundup per litre of water
For further information on calibration, contact your local agricultural department or rural equipment supplier.
More about Dr Greg O'Sullivan
More about Spray Equipment?
At 6:30pm on Thursday 22 June AEST the ACCC, along with representatives from peak industry groups, will be streaming a free webinar on the new law. The webinar will focus on the practical issues for businesses complying with the new food labelling requirements before they become mandatory on 1 July 2018.
The webinar will address the following questions:
to participate.
The first step to successful labeling is to ensure that the equipment has been specifically matched to your application.
The container, including glass bottles, plastic bottles, vials, etc can vary greatly in-wall shapes, heights, widths. Looking at the scope of variance in your packaging will need to be evaluated by someone experienced in this area of packaging equipment.
The labelling process and basic principles involve:
There are many different types of labeling machines from entry-level to 50,000 bottles per hour and more. The scope of equipment available in the marketplace is overwhelming.
Usually, machines are available in Semi-Automatic and Fully Automated. Semi-Automatic Labelling machines are operated and each bottle is placed into the machine to be able to perform the labelling operation. The function of labelling can be by turn handle, button, or foot pedal.
Fully automated labeling machines usually sit on the end of the filling and capping operations and form part of the process which usually feeds the packaging through by conveyor to each area. Packaging can be fed into the machine by a depalletising machine and machine packed on exit or this operation can happen manually depending on the capability of the machinery.
The Australian-manufactured Benchmate is a great performer in this category. The manually operated label applicator is operated by turn handle.
One step up from the Benchmate is the Benchmark and also Australian Made. This versatile model can apply single, full wrap-around or front and back label.
The Benchmax is capable of dealing with the widest range of product sizes, has exceptional speed with high output for industrial use, usability and supports transparent, clear label application.
See the full process of filling, capping and labelling operations with the Polaris Line
Over the years I have seen many issues and assisted producers with correcting their equipment as the setup and tension of the labels is imperative.
Some common issues in labelling can occur because;
Speaking with a labeling expert can certainly assist in matching the correct equipment for your scope of packaging and budget.
Labeling is an important process that needs to be perfect every time to give your brand a perfect presentation and the quality of equipment is important.
Labeling is an expression of you brand awareness. After all, this is the point whereby the consumer sees your brand and all you have to offer.
If you need assistance with labeling equipment, please contact The Olive Centre on 07 4696 9845 or email sales@theolivecentre.com.au? Please have information on-hand with the different bottles or containers available, label sizes and shapes.
Made in Australia, Great Engineering labellers have a range of the features that make them world class. The labeling machines, used for applying pressure sensitive labels, are more specifically, a new breed of machine providing ?on demand labelling?. Ideal for cylindrical containers for the food and beverage industry, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, wines, essential oils, edible oils, beer, contract packaging, health foods, jams and preserves, the labellers provide product identification and presentation for all products in round containers where market presence is important.
With a worldwide reputation for reliability and capability, the machines are exported to 55 countries and are acclaimed for their innovative design and quality.
Polaris Automazioni has been working in the bottling industry since the 1960s, operating out of its manufacturing site at Reggio nell?Emilia, Italy. Over the years, it has specialised in the design and?production of an automatic bottle filling machine?for special bottles, which are a major success in markets all around the world.
The company can offer a wide range of machines with a high content of cutting-edge technology and superior manufacturing efficiency protected by?industrial patents, capable of meeting the most diverse market demands.
Today, the people working at Polaris have the commercial and technical expertise needed to safeguard the continuity of the technical legacy left by its founder, giving new impulse for even more technical and commercial expansion, demanding a combination of know how and vision, matched by a focus on?innovations in technology.
